In such a crazy world, anyone who tells you they know would be lying to you, but we can examine the economic landscape and dig up some food for thought, methinks.
This is the single most clearly articulated and researched piece I have read lately, including your previous pieces. Thank you for every word.
I will be very eager to hear your thoughts on how, as under Lincoln, and FDR, the bulk of the wealth can be redistributed once again, with tax changes and plugged-shut loopholes.
Youβre very welcome and thank you for your kind words, they are appreciated given the time spent researching and attempting to articulate in a relatable way.
I have some ideas which Iβm hoping to share tomorrow if I can stay on topic π€£π€£
Check out Zev Shalevβs Narativ.Substack.com where heβs got a collaboration with Patrick Lovell called βThe Clean New Dealβ that offers concrete plans to un-corrupt the US. They did a live interview last night that is worth watching.
βThe Progressive movement was a political and social-reform movement that brought major changes to the United States during the late 19th and early 20th centuries. During this time, known as the Progressive Era, the movementβs goals involved strengthening the national government and addressing peopleβs economic, social, and political demands. Progressives saw elements of American society that they wished to reform, especially ending the extreme concentration of wealth among the elite and the enormous economic and political power of big business.β
The political right wing has been working to undo these reforms for over 100 years. It could take many years to restore our democracy, unless the masses awaken quickly and take the peaceful actions of non cooperation, and economic disengagement.
People on both sides have lost the plot. While Progressives unfortunately got bogged down with Intersectionality (unpopular race and gender politics), the right rejected the whole concept, as you say.
The real challenge lies not in the protest of a single day, but in the sustained action of the days and years that follow. We must move beyond immediate reaction and develop a master planβa long-term strategy that outlines concrete steps for defending democratic institutions and achieving genuine justice. Freedom demands an unyielding level of commitment, not just for oneself, but for the well-being and liberty of every community. The future of American democracy depends on turning collective outrage into organized, strategic, and enduring resistance.
I was soooo disappointed and sad to hear that Janet Mills was running against Graham Platner instead of backing him. I respect her for standing up to trump, but she isnβt a leader who has a vision. Schumer and Jeffries and their AIPAC money need to go.
And the inequalities of wealth and poverty in this country are, in my opinion, unAmerican and unacceptable. Iβm so sad for the country that my son has to live in. Thatβs why I will keep fighting peacefully, not caring whether Iβm jailed or not.
You didnβt go far enough back when speaking of the huge wealth disparity. Several months ago Professor Heather Cox Richardson (who writes for Facebook, SubStack & has a YouTube channel) said that between 1981 to 2021, $50 trillion+ had moved from the bottom 90% to the top 1%, accounting for our great wealth inequity. The Washington Post reported the same figures around that time as well. Those figures are much easier for me to remember, speak of & write of than your figures. Just a thought to consider.
I hated reading this article. It sucks. I mean the writing, information, and logic were all top notch. I just wanted to shoot the messenger. That's okay, right?
Has anyone considered why Schumer & Jeffries refuse to act boldly, the way that Democratic voters want?
Answer:
Theyβre getting what they want from the current paradigm.
They get to stay in senate/congress respectively without actually having to display any true leadership.
Perhaps itβs prudent to consider who is financing their milquetoast performances and recognize that they are doing exactly what they were installed to do.
Yes, and, could you address the fact that the Dominion Voting Machine company was purchased on 10/9 by a MAGott? The man made a point of saying they want to help the accuracy of paper ballot recording... so is there ANY hope that our votes will even be counted? It is all beyond comprehension at this point. While you answer this - I'll be learning the Canadian national anthem.
Wow, just wow, what a brilliant piece this was to read. A thousand thanks for your well written words and the courage to write them.
Be well. πππ
Thatβs very kind of you my friend, thank you π
Agree with your assessment. Schumer cannot read the room.
This is the single most clearly articulated and researched piece I have read lately, including your previous pieces. Thank you for every word.
I will be very eager to hear your thoughts on how, as under Lincoln, and FDR, the bulk of the wealth can be redistributed once again, with tax changes and plugged-shut loopholes.
Thank you again for this piece.
Youβre very welcome and thank you for your kind words, they are appreciated given the time spent researching and attempting to articulate in a relatable way.
I have some ideas which Iβm hoping to share tomorrow if I can stay on topic π€£π€£
Check out Zev Shalevβs Narativ.Substack.com where heβs got a collaboration with Patrick Lovell called βThe Clean New Dealβ that offers concrete plans to un-corrupt the US. They did a live interview last night that is worth watching.
Patrickβs website
Www.cleannewdeal.com has more details.
From Encyclopedia Britannica
βThe Progressive movement was a political and social-reform movement that brought major changes to the United States during the late 19th and early 20th centuries. During this time, known as the Progressive Era, the movementβs goals involved strengthening the national government and addressing peopleβs economic, social, and political demands. Progressives saw elements of American society that they wished to reform, especially ending the extreme concentration of wealth among the elite and the enormous economic and political power of big business.β
The political right wing has been working to undo these reforms for over 100 years. It could take many years to restore our democracy, unless the masses awaken quickly and take the peaceful actions of non cooperation, and economic disengagement.
People on both sides have lost the plot. While Progressives unfortunately got bogged down with Intersectionality (unpopular race and gender politics), the right rejected the whole concept, as you say.
From Danielle Moodie
The real challenge lies not in the protest of a single day, but in the sustained action of the days and years that follow. We must move beyond immediate reaction and develop a master planβa long-term strategy that outlines concrete steps for defending democratic institutions and achieving genuine justice. Freedom demands an unyielding level of commitment, not just for oneself, but for the well-being and liberty of every community. The future of American democracy depends on turning collective outrage into organized, strategic, and enduring resistance.
I wholeheartedly agree and have been saying so for a long time.
I was soooo disappointed and sad to hear that Janet Mills was running against Graham Platner instead of backing him. I respect her for standing up to trump, but she isnβt a leader who has a vision. Schumer and Jeffries and their AIPAC money need to go.
And the inequalities of wealth and poverty in this country are, in my opinion, unAmerican and unacceptable. Iβm so sad for the country that my son has to live in. Thatβs why I will keep fighting peacefully, not caring whether Iβm jailed or not.
You didnβt go far enough back when speaking of the huge wealth disparity. Several months ago Professor Heather Cox Richardson (who writes for Facebook, SubStack & has a YouTube channel) said that between 1981 to 2021, $50 trillion+ had moved from the bottom 90% to the top 1%, accounting for our great wealth inequity. The Washington Post reported the same figures around that time as well. Those figures are much easier for me to remember, speak of & write of than your figures. Just a thought to consider.
Noted
I hated reading this article. It sucks. I mean the writing, information, and logic were all top notch. I just wanted to shoot the messenger. That's okay, right?
π€£ Of course, I know Iβm that guy who always seems to be delivering shit news. What I would give for an upbeat day. - Martin
I hear you. I am a fan of the NY Jets. We haven't had an upbeat day since 1969.
Great post! Thank you!
Speaking of waking upβ¦
Has anyone considered why Schumer & Jeffries refuse to act boldly, the way that Democratic voters want?
Answer:
Theyβre getting what they want from the current paradigm.
They get to stay in senate/congress respectively without actually having to display any true leadership.
Perhaps itβs prudent to consider who is financing their milquetoast performances and recognize that they are doing exactly what they were installed to do.
Writing from outside the USA I wonder why it isn't possible to see exactly who is financing the pair (and their allies). Surely they have to declare all major contributions and their sources? And can't they be primaried on the run up to the next election so someone prepared to challenge this current rΓ©gime can replace them?
Yes, and, could you address the fact that the Dominion Voting Machine company was purchased on 10/9 by a MAGott? The man made a point of saying they want to help the accuracy of paper ballot recording... so is there ANY hope that our votes will even be counted? It is all beyond comprehension at this point. While you answer this - I'll be learning the Canadian national anthem.
I am on the case already. A piece will follow early next week. - Martin
Thank you!
Yes, I agree this is important and has been mostly overlooked.
I do actually share that optimism in terms of the capability that exists, but the dead weight needs to go and YESTERDAY